|
Arousal Deficiency Research |

Arousal
Deficiency: an Underlying Mechanism for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
(SIDS)
By Ariagno RL, Mirmiran M and Van Liempt S.
March 21, 2003
Introduction:
SIDS has the highest incidence between 1- 4 months
and occurs during sleep in both the healthy term and in the preterm
infant at similar corrected ages. A leading hypothesis for SIDS,
which we support, is that it is due to a deficiency in the arousal
response. Arousal is an important protective response to lower the
risk of SIDS in the term and preterm infant. Prone {"stomach")
sleeping position is the most important risk factor known for Sudden
Infant Death Syndrome {SIDS). Preterm infants are at much higher
risk (almost 5 times higher) for SIDS than term infants.
Our earlier sleep studies in preterm infants did
not show significant effect of sleep position on the total amount of
sleep, Quiet Sleep (OS) and Active Sleep (AS). The number of sleep
transitions {alternate way to identify arousal by noting frequency
of changes in sleep state) was more frequent at 36 wk and 1 mo
during supine sleep. Recent literature reports that the response to
an environmental stimulus (provoked arousal) is greater during
supine compared with prone sleeping position in preterm and term
infants. The effect of sleep state and sleep position on spontaneous
arousals {i.e., arousals from sleep which happen without an
environmental stimulus) in preterm infants has not been previously
studied. In the current study a new method for scoring arousals,
which measured the level of the arousal, was used to investigate the
development of spontaneous arousals patterns during sleep in preterm
infants. Comparisons of the frequency of the spontaneous sleep
arousal patterns seen during stomach and back sleeping was done to
see if fewer arousals occur with stomach sleeping. Sleep studies
measuring ECG, brain wave, breathing, and a continuous video were
done during a nap at 1 month and 3 months of age in the infant's
home. This new method for scoring arousals categorized the level of
the arousal into spinal type {involving only body movement),
brainstem {body movement with heart rate and breathing changes), and
cortical {which includes the above plus a change in brain wave
activity). The researchers hypothesized that preterm infants will
arouse less often in the stomach position. The study represents an
innovative approach to measuring arousal since it is the first to
apply this method to score spontaneous arousals. The findings
generated by this study could lay the groundwork for novel
investigations of how infants make minor and major adjustments in
brain function to facilitate protective respiratory responses, which
may avert a life-threatening situation and SIDS.
Method:
Fourteen premature infants GA 34 :t 2 wk and B.Wt.
2325 :t 493 g were studied in their home: 4 at corrected age of 1 m,
9 at both 1 and 3 m, and one baby at 3 m. These were "healthy"
preterm infants, who had no medical problems at the time of
discharge from the hospital. Daytime nap sleep recordings in stomach
and back sleeping positions were visually scored for active sleep
(AS) and quiet sleep (OS). Gross (movement of body and/or limbs)
body movements (GBM) with durations of 3 to 60 s during sleep were
scored as
spontaneous arousals. Ih addition heart rate,
respiratory, and EEG changes were measured during each GBM.
Start and end of each gross body movement observed
on video was used to define begin and end of arousal. Body movement
episodes that lasted for more than 60 seconds were considered
awakenings, and were not further analyzed.
A minimum of 10 seconds of undisturbed sleep was
required before a next arousal to be scored. By a software program (Somnologica)
beat to beat heart rate variation (HRV) was measured from the EGG
channel. Heart rate was considered changed, if the HRV during
arousal was much greater than the period before the change. The size
and the strength of the breath were used to measure breathing. The
number of breaths per minute and the size of the breath from moment
to moment varied. It was considered significant when both breathing
channels showed either lower or higher breathing rate; or altered
size of the breath compared with the baseline. During an arousal,
periods of lower brain wave size or faster brain waves for at least
one second were considered significant. Artifact was scored if it
was not possible to see the brain waves due to movement.
Results:
A total of 544 spontaneous arousals were
identified. In 524 of the 544 (96%) arousals, the heart rate was
increased above baseline. In 6 of the arousals, it was not possible
to calculate heart rate change, due to artifact, or missing tracings
(1%). In 14 arousals (3%), the heart rate was not changed. Heart
rate changes were not dependent on age (p=0.3991), nor on sleeping
position (p=0.8990). The breathing channels showed changes in 492 of
the 544 arousals (90%). Breathing changes were not dependent on age
(p=0.8847), noron sleep position (p=0.1481). The brain wave signal
could not be interpreted due to artifacts in 129 arousals (24%). In
39 arousals (7%)brain wave changes were seen. No brain wave changes
were seen in 137 arousals (25%). Overall, the length of arousals was
shorter at 3 m compared with 1 mo. (AS: 11.5 :t 9 s vs. 17.7 :t 10
s, respectively, p=<0.0001; as: 10.5 :t 6 s vs. 14.6 :t 17 s,
respectively, ns). There was no effect of position on mean arousal
duration in AS at 1 or 3 m but during as at 1 m arousal was longer
in supine 19.7 :t 20 s compared with prone 8.1 :t 6 s, p=0.02. There
was no effect of age on arousal interval, i.e., the time between
arousals. The mean duration of the time interval between successive
arousals in AS was longer on stomach position (204 :t 184 s) than in
back (144:t 134 s) position (p=0.05). There were no differences in
as (p=0.242). There was no effect of pacifier use on duration or
frequency of arousal.
Summary and Conclusion:
More frequent and longer duration of spontaneous
arousals found in this study confirms earlier findings of greater
arousal response in the back sleep position. These results support
that back to sleep provides a protective mechanism against life
threatening stimuli during sleep and could lower the risk for SIDS
associated with arousal deficiency during prone sleep.
Publications:
Ariagno RL, Mirmiran M, van Leimpt S, Adams MM.
The influence of sleep state and sleep position on spontaneous
arousal in healthy preterm infants at 1 and 3 months corrected age.
Pediatric Research, v. 51 (#4/pt.2/SS) pp. 377 A-378A APR 2002. A
full-Iength paper of this study is under preparation.
|